Human Rights, Democracy, And Peace - 1134 Words

â€Å"In a few decades, the relationship between the environment, resources, and conflict may seem almost as obvious as the connection we see today between human rights, democracy, and peace (Nobel Peace Prize Medalist Maathai 2004).† TransCanada, a Canadian company, has high hopes of beginning to build an oil pipeline that would stretch close to 2,000 miles from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast of Texas. With the approval of construction, the pipeline, known as the Keystone XL, would carry one of the world’s filthiest fuels; tar sand oil. Tar sands oil alone has levels of carbon dioxide emissions that are three to four times higher than those of conventional oil, due to more energy-intensive removal and refining processes (Friends of the†¦show more content†¦The U.S. uses nearly 400 million gallons of oil every day moving people in automobiles, goods on freight trucks, air travel, also rail and transit. Cars and everyday trucks use nine million barrels of oil per day alone (Sierra Club Foundation). Oil poses major environmental problems, and the world’s heavy reliance on it for transportation makes it difficult to reduce consumption. Spilled oil can harm living things because its chemical components are poisonous. This can affect organisms both from internal exposure to oil through ingestion or inhalation and from external exposure through skin and eye irritation. Oil can also smother some small species of fish or invertebrates and coat feathers and fur, reducing birds and mammals ability to maintain their body temperatures. The short-term threat from heavy oils, like tar sand oil, comes from their ability to smother organisms whereas over the long-term, some long-lasting health effects like tumors may result in some organisms (Office of Response and Restoration). If animals like birds and otters become drenched in heavy oil, they lose the ability to keep themselves warm and eventually die. The Keystone XL supporters exhaust the idea that constructing of the Keystone will create thousands of jobs. While that is partially true, the numbers are exaggerated and unemployment will only raise half of what supporters

Introducing the New Coke free essay sample

What is the case about? This case study is the story of Coca-Cola, its history and the report about one of the most fascinating stories about the company this is still regarded by many as a mysterious case: â€Å"the introduction of the new Coke†. The author Susan Fournier, in the case study went on by presenting the history of the Coca-Cola Company: how the company started and how throughout its history it became a brand, a part of everyone’s life both nationally and globally. Anecdotes and little stories were told about how Coca-Cola became a part of the American Culture, it how it changed the way consumers around the world perceived the Christmas holiday (Coca-Cola Classic Santa Claus). Midway through the case study, the author introduced what is still perceived today as one of the most intrigued case studies: the way Coca-Cola handled one of its competitors, Pepsi-Cola, and the introduction of the new Coke. The author walked us through how with marketing research, product testing (The Pepsi Challenge) and effective advertising, Pepsi-Cola was able to introduce itself in the American culture. Pepsi became Coca-Cola’s fierce competitor and started getting a growing share of the market of soft drinks. Blinded by internal and other distractions, Coca-Cola was caught by surprise when introduced â€Å"the Pepsi Challenge†, a series of blind tests where potential consumers tasted both Pepsi and Coke, with the results concluding that Pepsi had a better taste than Coke. Coca-Cola quick called the move false advertisement and conducted its own blind test only to realized what was already stated. Referring to the study case, Coca-Cola was more than a beverage company, it became a part of culture and politics, it changed the way Americans viewed Christmas, and it went global†¦ I think that Coca-Cola is not only in the beverage business, but also in entertainment, memory sharing, it provides nostalgia, a sense of ownership, pride, personality and belonging to its consumers, mostly in the US. Coca-Cola business is to offer a fun, memory-inspiring sweet beverage. 3. What was Coca-Cola’s brand building strategy? Where did Coke’s meanings come from? How did Coke’s meanings make a connection to consumers and to Christmas? Coca-Cola’s brand building strategy started first by finding its target, which early in its history was the non-alcoholic drinker. Shortly after the acquisition of the company by Griggs Candler who’s dream was â€Å"to place Coke within arm’s reach of desire wherever there are people who get thirsty†; Coca-Cola started building his brand. The strategy then was focused around: availability, affability and acceptability of its target public. To provide he aforementioned, the company focused on the price value of the product, preference and penetration. By connecting to their consumers constantly and effectively through excellent advertising, Coca-Cola was able to provide brand loyalty. With diversification within the company’s products, the brand was able to stay relevant throughout time. Coca-Cola meanings came from various sources, most notably the changes in the culture in the United States in the 1900s. The company quickly adapted to the social and cultural changes like pop culture; throughout artwork, they were able to reach the heart of America’s youth. The company was able to take advantage of the current events; most notably the world war which helped the company’s being global. The story of coke and Santa Claus was a strong example of how Coke’s meanings made a connection to Christmas and forever associated itself with America’s youth. In the early 1900s, Santa Claus was represented in various ways to the American audience: the saint was illustrated in blue, yellow or green; sometimes he was tall or was an elf. Coca-Cola hired an artist, Haddon Sundblom, who, in 1931, created the Coca-Cola classic Santa Claus. The caricature presented everything about the brand: it was bigger than life and joyful. With his illustrations and those awaited yearly Christmas ads, the artist and Coca-Cola shaped the way we, the consumers view Santa today. 4. What was Pepsi’s meaning management game? Was it really a threat to Coke? How should have responded to Pepsi’s meaning making advances? Pepsi’s meaning management game was totally different from Coke’s; it had to be in order to survive. Pepsi’s strategy was focused more on the user, rather than the product. By identifying itself to its target, the new generation, Pepsi was able to channel its message. The â€Å"Pepsi generation† ad campaign was a great reason for the growth of the brand. I believe that Pepsi was starting to become a concern, not a threat to coke. In my opinion, Coca-Cola’s mistakes were what help Pepsi’s growth to a certain degree. I believe that, if Coca-Cola took the time to keep an eye and research the competition and hire the right talent for the right positions, instead of focusing on internal problems reported by the case, it would have been better equipped to respond to Pepsi’s meaning making advances. I believe that they Coke should have stuck to their position and reinforce their position in the market that was already theirs, while developing news ways to adapt to the new trends of the culture in America. In terms of brand loyalty, Pepsi was nowhere near Coke, therefore Coke should of use that fact and keep on growing, because the brand was already established as a part of American lives, something that Pepsi, even with their meaning, wasn’t able to surpass. 5. What do you make of Keough’s marketing insights and Goizueta’s famous speech as chairman? What were their core assumptions, their mandates? Is this the stuff brand meaning makers are made of? I believe that Goizueta’s famous speech, although rejuvenating was not the right course of actions for the company because he was totally wrong in his assessments which were: †¢ Statistical results that led him to believe that Coca-Cola distribution process was not the best †¢ He also believed that the company’s marketing strategy was not good enough †¢ He kept comparing his company to others Although to a certain degree he might have been right, he failed miserably in assessing what was working for its company which was its brand. In terms of brand meaning making, he was not the right talent, he lacked perspective because he should have known that you do not change a winning team in the face of adversity, you tweak it. I believe that no matter what the company is going through, if the brand management is strong the company can surpass any obstacles because with a strong brand, the consumers will keep on coming, it is a matter of nourishing the success of that brand, hence always ocus on the consumer and find ways to keep him happy. 6. Hindsight is indeed 20/20, but putting bias aside, what major factor do you think caused the failure of the new Coke launch? Do you think it was the product, the process or both? I believe that the failure of the launch of the new Coke was cause by the â€Å"new product† and its process. I think the major factor of the failure was th at they high administration of the company reacted emotionally to their competitor and ended up losing their identity by trying to come with a new product to present to the consumers. The company should use the formula that it had been using since the beginning of the 19th century, adapt to the consumer desire. In addition, I believe that the company didn’t handle the introduction of the new coke to the public well. They had put their focus on the wrong aspect: advertising, thinking that a strong campaign will help encourage the consumer to adopt the new product; an assessment that was totally wrong. Meanwhile, the consequence was Pepsi being able capitalize on these mistakes, because they had figure out that they need a constant eye on the competitor in order to better adapt. . Coca-Cola invested $4 million researching the reformulation, yet they still got it very, very wrong. Keough claims that â€Å"all the time and money and skill poured into consumer research on the new Coke could not measure or reveal the deep and abiding emotional attachment to original Coca-Cola felt by so many consumers, the passion for original coke†¦ it is a wonderful Ameri can enigma, and you cannot measure it any more than you can you can measure love, pride or patriotism. † Is Keogh right? If so how can you manage it if you can’t measure it? By focusing on the user in its early ages, along with keeping in touch with the socio-cultural and political changes throughout the years in society, Coca-Cola was able to build a strong an effective brand. The brand became a part of life of every American to the point that some consumers referred to drinking Coke as a patriotic act. I believe that Keogh was right in his assessment. Yes, indeed it is difficult, may be impossible to measure, but manageable. In my opinion, with the loyalty of the consumers, the brand already had a tremendous asset; managing the brand and keep the product in the mind of the consumers was how I think that Coca-Cola could manage the emotional attachment of the consumers. 8. What does the case reveal about how brand meanings are developed and cultivated? From the brand management strategies of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi, the case revealed some great insights about how brand meaning are developed and cultivated. Below is a list of what I believe are key concepts narrated in the case that proves this assessment: †¢ Cultural awareness: being able as a company to keep track of what is going on the society in the means of culture, politics, social and other factors †¢ The focus on the consumer: by being able to focus on the consumer and the research of its environment, the companies were able to cater to them, hence producing economic growth Using the right tools: in the case of Coca-Cola, using everything that is available to the consumer to be able to reach out to your audience. †¢ Marketing research and consumer behavior: with the Pepsi challenge, the company was able to build a whole strategy that focused on its target, the new generation, which help the company climb the mountain of success and relevance in the eyes of the public. 9. What can you draw from the case that relates to consumer culture and its impact on consumer behavior? A couple of anecdotes in the case can help draw the relation to consumer culture and its impact on consumer behavior. In the early 1900s it was about freedom, American society and a sense of freedom, Coca-Cola responded by advertising their product has being fresh and a provider of freedom; the consumers would then easily connect to that. The idea of selling Coca-Cola overseas to the troops while the world was at war brought a sense of patriotism and ownership to the product, consumers then felt a sense of safety and pride when drinking a coke. The Christmas ads were also another example, by caricaturing Santa as a hard worker who brings gifts to the kids, the youth was able to connect and by rewarding Santa with a Coke after a night of hard work, parents could also relate. These are prime examples narrated throughout the case that relates to consumer culture and its impact on consumer behavior. 10. What does the case suggest about conducting marketing research and consumer perception? The story on how Pepsi began to grow his brand is an excellent example of marketing research and consumer perception. At the time, Pepsi was able to research the behavior of the baby boomers, who back then, were considered the new generation. Pepsi was able to identify itself to this group and allowed these consumers to feel a sentiment of identity. Pepsi product testing also helped them in their research. As it is reported in the case, Pepsi capitalized on the results of these blind tests conducted on both Pepsi and its competitor. The company was able to build a strategy around its research results that led to the growth of the company as a whole.

T.H. Marshalls Theory of Citizenship Essay Example

T.H. Marshalls Theory of Citizenship Paper Critically discuss T. H. Marshall’s theory of citizenship as outlined inCitizenship and Social Class ( 1949/1992 ) . At the Centre of the development of citizenship in modern Britain is the pioneering work of T.H. Marshall ( Faulks, 1998 ) . T.H. Marshall proposed an highly influential theory in respects to citizenship ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . Through his analysis of citizenship, Marshall has to be acknowledged as placing an original theoretical base point from which to understand a societal phenomenon ( Held and Thompson, 1989 ) . Few British Social Scientists other than Marshall have straight considered the construct of citizenship and made it their cardinal focal point in their work ( Lister, 2010 ) . Therefore, it has been Marshall’s part that has been considered a get downing point for farther research into the topic of citizenship rights ( Held and Thompson, 1989 ) . Furthermore, as Roche ( 1992 ) has identified, Marshall’s writings organize a cardinal text which he has labelled the ‘Dominant paradigm’ within citizenship theory in Britain ( Faulks, 1998 ) . We will write a custom essay sample on T.H. Marshalls Theory of Citizenship specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on T.H. Marshalls Theory of Citizenship specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on T.H. Marshalls Theory of Citizenship specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer When reviewing the work of Marshall it is of import to recognize how defining citizenship is built-in to understanding the constructs expressed in his work and others to day of the month. Marshall defined citizenship as ‘full rank of a community’ ( Marshall, 1963: 72 ) . Marshall so clarified that full citizenship position involved rank of a national community ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . Marshall’s deduction was that each person considered a citizen could, hence, expect certain rights of entitlement from the province and in return would be expected to continue certain criterions or responsibilities within the community to be considered a ‘citizen’ . As the definition of citizenship has developed over the old ages so has the constructs of which it encompasses. As such, when reviewing Marshall’s work it is of import to admit the epoch during which the theories considered were proposed as noted by Dwyer ( 2010 ) . The fortunes during the clip of this essay were well different to those of modern society within Britain. Marshall’s work was considered following the Second World War and the constitution of the station war public assistance colony ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . Consequently, this has led to critical treatment of Marshall’s theories sing citizenship and its value by a figure of faculty members to day of the month ( Alcock, 1989 ; Delanty, 2000 ; Dwyer, 2010 and Lister, 2010 ) . Marshall considers each facet by analyzing each attack historically to the development for rights. Marshall outlined three interlinked elements of rights that took the signifier of civil, political and societal rights ( Lister, 2010 ) . The construct of civil rights in Britain came to prominence during the 18th century and included ; ‘the rights necessary for single freedom, autonomy of the individual, freedom of address, thought and faith, the right to have belongings and to reason valid contractors, and the right to justice’ ( Marshall, 1963: 74 ) . Discussion of political rights followed during the 19th century, which included, the right to vote and stand for political office ( Marshall, 1949/1992 ) . The concluding component of rights was concluded with the ownership of societal rights to to the full categorize person as a citizen. The construct of societal rights developed chiefly in the station Second World War period. Marshall’s definition of societal rights has undergone much examination due to his equivocal theoretical position. Powell ( 2002 ) and Dwyer ( 2010 ) in peculiar remark on this deficiency of lucidity, â€Å"He is clear that there is no overarching cosmopolitan rule that decidedly defines what citizenship grants or requires† ( Dwyer, 2010:39 ) . As Marshall ( 1949/92 ) high spots on several occasions, civil citizenship rights are wholly of the conditions of a free market economic system, including a free labor market. Conversely, Marshall appears to be instead cognizant of the contradictions within the assorted strands of citizenship, although the facets seem to complect it would look they do non ever agree. Potential contradictions between societal and civil citizenship, Marshall openly discussed in footings of the struggle between citizenship and category ( Bagguley, 2013 ) . As Turner ( 1993 ) indicates, Marshall’s analysis of capitalist economy versus democracy contained a figure of ambiguities, but as a whole, Marshall strongly argued that the public assistance province would restrict the negative impact of category differences on single life-chances. Ultimately this would heighten the individual’s committedness to the system. Additionally, the epoch of which societal rights were development may impact how some persons may construe them ( Lister, 2010 ) . The development of civil freedoms was a important measure in the undoing of the hierarchal crude restrictions of position or responsibility to an individual’s societal higher-ups ( Lister, 2010 ) . Civil freedoms were besides a necessary foundation for the ulterior development of the 2nd type of rights noted by Marshall as political rights. Marshall acknowledges four major purposes to his essay. First, he examines whether citizenship is compatible with the category construction in a capitalist society such as Britain. Although he states this is possible, persons such as Faulks, ( 1998 ) feel he is ‘cautious’ in saying this. The tenseness between citizenship and capitalist economy arises out of the fact that citizenship high spots equality, while capitalist economy presumes inequality ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . For Marshall, the compatibility of citizenship with capitalist economy was due to societal rights by ‘civilising’ the impact of the market ( Faulks, 1998 ) . Marshall identifies the addition of incomes, the growing of nest eggs and the success of mass production as enabling society to redistribute wealth and societal power ( Lister, 2010 ) . Developments such as the progressive revenue enhancement system and the usage of legal assistance are shown to cut down the influence of category, efficacious ly, making societal justness via societal rights ( Held and Thompson, 1989 ) . As his 2nd consideration, truly, Marshall argues that citizenship in Britain can non be to the full achieved without changing market operations of the clip ( Faulks, 1998 ) . Third, Marshall identifies the displacement to rights away from duties and the consequence of this, and he considered this to be the most of import facet of citizenship in modern Britain ( Somers, 2004 ) . Finally, Marshall attempts to set up the bounds of societal equality and find merely how far the battle for societal justness could realistically travel ( Tilly, 1996 ) . Marshall contended an image of an ‘ideal citizenship’ and thereby, a end towards which aspirations can be directed. T.H. Marshall’s attack to societal citizenship has been regarded as a democratic socialist position. As Delanty ( 2002 ) recognised, societal democracy and Marshall’s classless liberalism had several facets in common. Other influential minds such as Richard Titmuss shared a similar passion within the societal democratic tradition ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . Dwyer ( 2010 ) and Alcock and Oakley ( 2001 ) have identified the attacks of Titmuss and Marshall, who portion several resemblances. Each author showed a considerable importance to universal unrestricted public assistance rights. Furthermore, both Marshall and Titmuss, outlined the designation and consideration of the ‘class struggle’ which is notably identified as an of import facet of the development of societal citizenship. Marshall and Titmuss besides suggest that the development of British industrial capitalist economy is of greater significance for the outgrowth of societal rights ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . Additiona lly, the two authors shared the same optimism about the motives that underpin human nature. Titmuss and Marshall both assumed that citizens would largely act in a responsible mode and expression to heighten their ain lives, and the lives of fellow members of their national community, instead than mistreat any benefits that societal rights may convey for single addition ( Alcock and Oakley, 2001 ) As Dwyer ( 2010 ) , truly provinces, personal reading is finally what pins down the determination about whether or non the work of T.H. Marshall can be seen as societal democratic. Key subjects that are cardinal to Social Democracy have been identified as: the publicity of equality, freedom, societal integrating and cosmopolitan rights to welfare ( Held and Thompson, 1989 ; Turner, 1993 ) . Arguably Marshall’s ( 1949/92 ) indorsement of these beliefs identifies him as a societal Democrat of kinds, even if possibly he moved off from this place in ulterior life. Delanty ( 2000 ) refers to Marshall’s positions as a socially democratic left flying broad attack to citizenship. Marshall’s Citizenship theory, although seen as pioneering, has been the head of many reviews ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . As Tilly ( 1996 ) provinces, Marxist critics of Marshall’s work on citizenship are widely known, depicting the analysis Marshall has given every bit superficial as it does non highlight, a citizen’s right to command economic production, which has been argued as a necessity for continual shared richness ( Somers, 1994 ) . Furthermore, feminist positions as stated by Lister ( 2008 ) states Marshall’s theory as being highly confined in being entirely on work forces, while non admiting, the societal rights of adult females. ( Held and Thompson 1989 ) . Therefore, Marshall’s Theory reflects that of merely the on the job category white male position ( Lister, 2003 ) . His statement that in England wholly people were free and had civil rights can be seen as fancied, as at the clip merely work forces had ‘legal freedom’ or the capable ness to exert political or civil rights ( Lister, 2008 ) . Additionally, Marshall does non discourse other facets of society including 2nd category citizens and gender and racial hierarches ( Tilly, 1996 ) . Although Marshall did non discourse the issues associated with 2nd category people, he acknowledged that citizenship itself plays a portion in societal inequality ( Marshall, 1942/92 ) . As one time noted earlier it is of import to understand the fortunes during the clip of this essay were well different to those of modern society within Britain ( Dwyer, 2010 ) Furthermore, Neo-liberal positions and free market political orientation asserts that the non-engagement of the province from economic protection is the foundation of a society with strength and goodness ( Held and Thompson, 1989 ) . Consequently they are wholly opposed to the societal rights proposed by Marshall ( Turner, 1993 ) . Neo-liberals alternatively suggest that public assistance plans such as some of the societa l duties discussed by Marshall to assist the hapless in efficaciously using their civil and political rights, have promoted passiveness among the hapless without bettering life opportunities and have created a civilization of public assistance dependence ( Held and Thompson, 1989 ; Roche, 1992 ) . Citizenship, or the equality of rights it generates, becomes an integrative procedure antagonizing the inclinations towards societal division and struggle generated by the economic system. For Marshall, inequality was non an issue within itself. His focal point was to happen an acceptable balance between the forces for inequality and those for equality ( Lewis 1998 ) . Marshall distinguished between countries of the public assistance province where greater grades of inequality where acceptable and those where this was non the instance, as the contrasts between the wellness service system and legal assistance high spot ( Marshall, 1949/92 ) . Furthermore, this illustrated that for Marshall, citizenship concepts an affinity between rights and responsibilities. However, this balance is non distributed every bit among all who might do the claim to citizenship ( Lewis, 1998 ) . To reason, while sing whether citizenship is compatible with the category construction in a capitalist society such as Britain, Marshall seems cautious in saying that this is possible ( Faulks, 1998 ) . Marshall provided an evolutionary position of citizenship, developing through assorted phases and degrees to make its concluding incarnation in the rules of British public assistance political relations ( Turner, 1993 ) . The extent of rights and responsibilities that citizenship entails is unfastened to ongoing argument and has been challenged over clip. However, Marshall seems positive about the enrichment of citizenship at the clip of authorship ( Dwyer, 2010 ) . Initially, Marshall put the relationship between the citizen, the province and the societal public assistance at the Centre of his analysis. Marshall achieved this by his suggestion of consisting citizenship into three complecting facets. Marshall viewed civil, political and societal rights as a consequence of an evolution ary procedure, with each component overlapping ( Turner, 1993 ) . Marshall’s citizenship is a position rendered to people who can claim full citizenship of a community. Although, as noted by Lewis ( 1998 ) Marshall did non clearly province a standard to which people may get such rank. Furthermore, there is a long and on-going argument as to whether Marshall intended his historical analysis to be interpreted as a general theory of citizenship or whether the essay was merely a commentary on the developments of citizenship within England ( Faulks, 1998 ) . Bibliography. Alcock, P. ( 1989 ) . ‘Why Citizenship and New Welfare Rights Offer new Hope for Welfare in Britain, ’ Critical Social Policy,Vol 19, no 2, pp 32-43 Alcock, P. and Oakley, A. ( 2001 ) . ‘Introduction’ , in P.Alcock, H Glennerster, A. Oakley and A. Sinfield ( explosive detection systems )Welfare and Wellbeing: Richard Titmuss’s part to societal policy,Bristol: The Policy Press, pp1-9 Bagguley, P. ( 2013 ) Industrial citizenship: a re-conceptualisation and instance survey of the UK ,International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,Vol. 33 no: 5/6, pp.265 279 Delanty, G. ( 2000 )Citizenship in a Global Age: Society Culture and Politics,Buckingham: Open University Press Dwyer, P. ( 2010 ) .Understanding Social Citizenship: Subjects and positions for policy and pattern. 2nd erectile dysfunction. Great Britain: The Policy Press. Faulks, K ( 1998 ) .Citizenship in Modern Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Held, D. and Thompson, J. ( 1989 ) .Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lewis, G. ( 1998 ) . Citizenship. In: Hughes, G.Imagining Welfare Futures. London: Routledge Ltd. pp 103-50. Lister, R ( 2003 ) .Citizenship: Feminist Positions. 2nd erectile dysfunction. New York: New York University Press. 2003. Lister, R ( 2010 ) .Understanding Theories and Concepts in Social Policy.Great Britain: The Policy Press. Marshall, T.H. ( 1949/92 ) ‘Citizenship and societal class’ , in T.H. Marshall and T.Bottomore,Citizenship and societal category, London: Pluto Press Marshall, T.H. and Bottomore, T. ( 1992 )Citizenship and societal category,London: Pluto Press Powell, M. ( 2002 ) ‘The Hidden History of Social Citizenship’ ,Citizenship Studies,Vol 6, no 3, pp 229-45 Somers, M. R. ( 1994) , Rights, Relationality, and Membership: Rethinking the Making and Meaning of Citizenship. Law A ; Social Inquiry, 19: 63–114. Tilly, C ( 1996 ) .Citizenship, Identity and Social History.International Review of Social History, 40, pp 1-17. Turner, B ( 1993 ) .Citizenship and Social Theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Student Exam figure: Y82850301

Effects of Global Warming on Polar Bears Essay Example

Effects of Global Warming on Polar Bears Essay Example Effects of Global Warming on Polar Bears Essay Effects of Global Warming on Polar Bears Essay No 1 is safe from the rough effects of planetary heating. But if there is one species which suffers the most. they are the polar bears who can merely last under highly cold clime. Although their existent population is difficult to find. they are believed to be about 20. 000 to 25. 000 found throughout the Arctic Ocean and next seas ( World Wildlife Organization ) . Polar bears’ home ground is about covered by sea ice all twelvemonth unit of ammunition ( Great Bear Organization ) . The country is said to hold a delicate ecosystem. necessitating longer clip to alter and to retrieve when disrupted or damaged. However. research shows that the Arctic is most likely to be ice free between 2013 and 2040 for the first clip in history. The part has been sing cutting of the polar ice cap due to warming of temperatures. With the thaw of the ice comes the devastation of the life of the species which thrives in the Arctic. Polar bears. seals. including endangered species like seahorses and giants. are forced to withdraw to environment less suited for their brand up. Further. scientists fear that big sums of liquid ice enter the North Atlantic and interrupt the planetary current form. The thaw of the Arctic ice besides entails smaller runing country for polar bears. Sealing waxs are their favourite and they can non track them where the sea is unfrozen. They besides eat workss. including berries. roots. and kelp. but none of these can fulfill their Calorie demand. Their organic structure needs big sum of fats from Marine animate beings for they are active year-round. Decrease in Arctic sea ice can take to 67 percent loss of the full polar bear population in 50 old ages ( Bear Planet Organization ) . Though polar bears are exposed to other hazards such as pollution. oil and gas geographic expedition. legal and illegal hunting. planetary heating remains the biggest menace to their endurance. They experience malnutrition and famishment due to habitat loss. Melting ice force them to shore before they have acquired adequate fat militias to last the period of scarce nutrient during the late summer and early autumn. Thining ice are surface hard to walk on because they deform more easy which makes it more hard for them to run for nutrient. They besides need to swim wider spreads between ice which farther used up their energy and sometimes take to submerging. Malnourished female polar bears result to take down generative rates and lower endurance rates among greenhorns and juvenilles ( Rosing. 2006 ) . Thining ice make it difficult for grownup females to happen couples. And when they do happen 1. the difficult pursuit starts for a suited pregnancy lairs. Underground lairs have inclinations to prostration or have low insulative power to supply heat for freshly born greenhorn. Dens built on multi-year ice may see motion that may ensue in longer distances for female parents and immature greenhorns to walk when they return to seal-hunting countries. There is besides a hazard of disease-causing bacteriums and parasites to boom more readily in a heater clime. In Western Huson Bay. ice interruptions up earlier than it did 30 old ages ago during late spring season which shortens the hunting season for polar nears ( National Wildlife Organization ) . Their population declined by 22 per centum from 1987 to 2004 and their organic structure status is much different. weighing 60kg igniter in 2004 than in 1980 when likely pregnant female polar bears weigh around 290kg. In 2005. Alaska recorded four drowned polar bears who made longer swim than they usually do when runing for nutrient. Alaska besides documented higher mortality rates among polar bear greenhorn and different denning sites for pregnant polar bears. Photos and pictures of polar bears’ battle are everyplace. In 2008. US Department of the Interior listed Polar Bears as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act and thaw of the sea ice in the Arctic as the biggest danger to their endurance ( The Humane Society of the United States ) . They are the lone species aside from elkhorn coral and staghorn coral to be put on the said list. However. the determination was reversed following the commercial and scientific informations that they are increasing in Numberss in the past 30 old ages. As it presently stands. the US Fish and Wildlife Service see polar bears as threatened species intending anytime their home ground will disappear and their position will alter to endangered before they finally become nonextant. In Canada. polar bears were recommended by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada to be placed under the list of species of particular concern . This list allows for a direction program to be written in five old ages. which was criticized by World Wide Fund for Nature as being excessively long to do a substantial impact to habitat loss from climate alteration. Since their current position is threatened species. it is non excessively late for attempts toward salvaging their home ground from farther debasement ( Bear Planet Organization ) . The simplest but the best manner to extenuate the effects of planetary heating is to halt C dioxide ( CO2 ) emanations. Recycle and reuse merchandises and utilize energy efficient contraptions to cut back CO2 in the ambiance. Polar bears deserve a opportunity. Bear Planet Organization. Polar Bears and Global Warming. July 8. 2009. lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. bearplanet. org/global-warming-polar-bears. shtml gt ; . Great Bear Organization. Polar Bear ( Ursus Maritimus ) . July 7. 2009. lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. greatbear. org/polarbear. htm gt ; . The Humane Society of the United States. Polar Bears. July 8. 2009. lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. hsus. org/marine_mammals/a_closer_look_at_marine_mammals/polar_bears/ # Polar_bears_top_predators_in_their_arcti gt ; . National Wildlife Organization. Polar Bear. July 8. 2009. lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nwf. org/polarbear/ gt ; . Rosing. Norbert. The World of the Polar Bear. New york: Firefly Books. Ltd. 2006. World Wildlife Organization. WWF: A Leader in Polar Bear Conservation. July 7. 2009. lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. worldwildlife. org/species/finder/polarbear/polarbear. hypertext markup language. gt ; .

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court The FISA court is a highly secretive panel of 11 federal judges whose primary responsibility is to decide whether the U.S. government has enough evidence against foreign powers or individuals believed to be foreign agents to allow for their surveillance by the intelligence community. FISA is an acronym for the  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The court is also referred to as the  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or FISC. The federal government cannot use the FISA court to  intentionally target any U.S. citizen, or any other U.S. person, or to intentionally target any person known to be in the United States, though the  National Security Agency has acknowledged  it inadvertently collects information on some Americans without a warrant in the name of national security. FISA, in other words, is not a tool for combating domestic terrorism but it has been used in the post-September 11th era to gather data on Americans. The FISA court adjourns in a bunker-like complex operated by the U.S. District Court on Constitution Avenue, near the  White House and Capitol. The courtroom is said to be  soundproof to prevent eavesdropping and the judges do not speak publicly about the cases because of the sensitive nature of national security. In addition to the FISA court, there is a second secret judicial panel called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review  whose responsibility to oversee and review the decisions made by the FISA court. The Court of Review, like the FISA court, is seated in Washington, D.C. But it is made up of only three judges from the federal district court or appeals court. Functions of the FISA Court   The FISA court’s role is to rule on applications and evidence submitted by the federal government and to grant or deny warrants for  Ã¢â‚¬Å"electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes.† The court is the only one in the land that has the authority to allow federal agents to conduct â€Å"electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information,† according to the Federal Judicial Center. The FISA court requires the federal government to provide substantial evidence before it grants surveillance warrants, but the judges rarely ever turn down applications. If the FISA court grants an application for government surveillance, it also limits the scope of the intelligence gathering to a specific location, telephone line or email account, according to published reports.   FISA has since its enactment been a bold and productive tool in this country’s fight against the efforts of foreign governments and their agents to engage in intelligence-gathering aimed at the U.S. government, either to ascertain its future policy or to effect its current policy, to acquire proprietary information not publicly available, or to engage in disinformation efforts, wrote James G. McAdams III, a former Justice Department official and senior legal instructor with the Department of Homeland Securitys  Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers. Origins of the FISA Court The FISA court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. President Jimmy Carter signed the act on Oct. 25, 1978. It was originally intended to allow for electronic surveillance but has seen been expanded to include physical searches and other data-collection techniques. FISA was signed into law amid  the Cold War and a period of deep skepticism of the president after the Watergate scandal and disclosures that the federal government used electronic surveillance and physical searches of citizens, a member of Congress, congressional staffers, anti-war protesters and civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. without warrants. The act helps to solidify the relationship of trust between the American people and their government, Carter said in signing the bill into law. It provides a basis for the trust of the American people in the fact that the activities of their intelligence agencies are both effective and lawful. It provides enough secrecy to ensure that intelligence relating to national security can be securely acquired, while permitting review by the courts and Congress to  safeguard the rights of Americans and others. Expansion of FISA Powers The  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act has been expanded beyond its original scope several times since Carter placed his signature on the law in 1978. In 1994, for example, the act was amended to allow the court to grant warrants for the use of  pen registers, trap and trace devices and business records. Many of the most substantive expansions were put in place after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. At the time, Americans indicated a willingness to trade some measures of freedom in the name of national security. Those expansions include: The passage of the USA Patriot Act in October 2001. The acronym stands for  Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The Patriot Act broadened the scope of the governments use of surveillance and allowed the intelligence community to act more quickly in wiretapping. Critics including the American Civil Liberties Union, however, pointed out the allowed the government to obtain the personal records of ordinary Americans from libraries and Internet Service Providers even without probable cause.The passage of the  Protect America Act on August 5, 2007. The law allowed the National Security Agency to conduct surveillance without a warrant or approval from the FISA court on American soil if the target was believed to be a foreign agent. In effect, wrote the ACLU, the government may now scoop up all communications coming into or out of the United States, as long as it is targeting no one American in particular and the program is â€Å"directed at† the foreign end of the communication.  Whether the target or not, American phone calls, emails and internet use will be recorded by our government, and without any suspicion of wrongdoing.   The passage of the FISA Amendments Act in 2008, which granted the government the authority to access communication data from Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo. Like to Protect America Act of 2007, the FISA Amendments Act targeted non-citizens outside of the United States but concerned privacy advocates because of the likelihood average citizens were being watched without their knowledge or a warrant from the FISA court. Members of the FISA Court Eleven federal judges are assigned to the FISA court. They are appointed by the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and serve seven-year terms, which are nonrenewable and staggered to ensure continuity. FISA Court judges are not subject to confirmation hearings such as those required for Supreme Court nominees. The statute that authorized the creation of the FISA court mandates the judges represent at least seven of the U.S. judicial circuits and that three of judges live within 20 miles of Washington, D.C., where the court sits. The judges adjourn for one week at a time on a rotating basis The current FISA Court judges are: Rosemary M. Collyer: She is the presiding judge on the FISA court and has been a U.S. District Court judge for the District of Columbia since being nominated to the federal bench by President George W. Bush in 2002. Her term on the FISA court began May 19, 2009, and expires March 7, 2020.James E. Boasberg: He has been a U.S. District Court judge for the District of Columbia since being nominated to the federal bench by President Barack Obama in 2011. His term on the FISA court began May 19, 2014, and expires March 18, 2021.Rudolph Contreras: He has been a U.S. District Court judge for the District of Columbia since being nominated to the federal bench by Obama in 2011. His term on the FISA court began May 19, 2016, and expires May 18, 2023.Anne C. Conway: She has been a U.S. District Court judge for the Middle District of Florida since being nominated to the federal bench by President George H.W. Bush in 1991. Her term on the FISA court began May 19, 2016, and expires May 18, 2023.Ra ymond J. Dearie: He has been a U.S. District Court judge for the Eastern District of New York since being nominated to the federal bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1986. His term on the FISA court began July 2, 2012, and ends July 1, 2019. Claire V. Eagan: She has been a U.S. District Court judge for the Northern District of Oklahoma since being nominated to the federal bench by President George W. Bush in 2001. Her term on the FISA court began Feb. 13, 2013, and ends May 18, 2019.James P. Jones: He has served as a U.S. District Court judge for the Western District of Virginia since being nominated for the federal bench by President William J. Clinton in 1995. His term on the FISA court began on May 19, 2015, and ends May 18, 2022.Robert B. Kugler: He has served as a U.S. District Court judge for the District of New Jersey since being nominated for the federal bench by George W. Bush in 2002. His term on the FISA court began May 19, 2017, and ends May 18, 2024.Michael W. Mosman: He has served as a U.S. District Court judge for the District of Oregon since being nominated for the federal bench by President George W. Bush in 2003. His term on the FISA court began May 04, 2013, and ends May 03, 2020.Thomas B. Russell: He has served as a U.S. District Court judge for the Western District of Kentucky since being nominated for the federal bench by Clinton in 1994. His term on the FISA court began May 19, 2015, and ends May 18, 2022. John Joseph Tharp Jr.: He has served as a U.S. District Court judge for the Northern District of Illinois since being appointed by Obama in 2011. His term on the FISA court began May 19, 2018, and ends May 18, 2025. Key Takeaways: The FISA Court FISA stands for the  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The act was established during the Cold War.The 11 members of the FISA court decide whether the U.S. government can spy on foreign powers or individuals believed to be foreign agents.The FISA court is not supposed to allow the U.S. to spy on Americans or others living in the county, even though the governments powers have expanded under the act.

Depend on the choosen activity and the topic Essay

Depend on the choosen activity and the topic - Essay Example The word ‘learning’ has been defined as â€Å"relatively permanent change in behavior resulting form experience† (Dworetzky, 1994). This essay, therefore, has the purpose of exploring the cognitivist approach of learning by examining its application to a particular learning task. The task chosen is the process of typing the keyboard of a computer. Firstly, an analysis of the types of knowledge required to undertake the chosen activity will be considered and the cognitive theory will be introduced with its main features followed by a discussion of the application of the theory in the process of typing the keyboard of the computer. The strength and weaknesses of the theory will be analyzed after that and the essay will be concluded. There are different steps or processes involved in the act of typing the keyboard of a computer. The person needs to have a plan of what he is going to type; he needs to have appropriate knowledge and skills such as placing the fingers at the right position, the aptitude of typing the material with appropriate speed and accuracy, being seated in a comfortable position in the chair so that he doesn’t strain his back, etc. Declarative knowledge is often described as the content of learning. In other words it caters to the what of the activity being learnt. Knowing a piece of information, that is, a concept, fact, idea or label would be considered to be in this category (Ehren & Gildroy). Knowing the history, characteristics or physical appearance, for example would be included here. Procedural knowledge explains the How of information that tells us rules to follow to accomplish a task (Ehren & Gildroy). In other words, knowing how to perform an action or sequence of actions is procedural knowledge. Conditional knowledge is knowledge about when to use a procedure, skill, or strategy and when not to use it; why a procedure works and under what

Organization Study Project Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Organization Study Project - Research Paper Example Due to our expertise in water and sanitation as a researcher, we were called by the organization to study the loop holes of the organization and also to carry out the assessment of the ongoing running project by the NGO. The NGO was running the project of installing hand pumps for the Afghan refugees which is the largest Afghan refugee’s camp in Pakistan, located in Haripur. Due to this team work and collaboration, it was quiet easy to sort out the locations from where the water sample was to be taken because the NGO already knew the sites, so we just needed to travel along with them and take out the water sample from different areas and bring them back to our university. Before going for field work, we had a group discussion with the community mobilizer of the NGO, he told us about the situation and conditions of the project and about the success of the project. The NGO was recently working on phase 2 of the project, and in phase 1 it provided the hand pumps and the flush toi lets to the community. Recently in the phase 2 they were covering two union councils of the Haripur in which 18 hand pumps was the target. First twenty years, this NGO served afghan refugee community (which is the highest community of Afghans in Pakistan located in Haripur). This NGO developed a water user association in which they provides the community management skills to the people and the aim is to develop linkage of the local people with the authorities. For this task of the provision of the hand pumps and the flush toilets, the NGO worked as a community need based assessment and started to work, employing the local people for the physical force, and also taken 20 percent share from the local people. Since 8-9 months the activities has been ceased but management team is still there to monitor. To make the investment sustainable the NGO links the organization to the government. It worked on the basis of gross root institutional development which is directly proportional to the development. The NGO also made the district health board for the local community. The NGO also conducted health and hygiene sessions for the local awareness and community management skills training program. The community mobilization process included the need assessment, realization, and conceptualization. In the management skill training involved the process of consultation, gain and confidence and future vision. FIELD ANALYSIS: During the field analysis, we collected the sample from the water sources and put them in the labeled glass bottles and keep the lid tight. The sample bottles were pre sterilized to avoid the contamination. As the precautionary measure it was important that to close the bottle lids as soon as the water was put in the bottle, this was to avoid the air contamination in the samples and it was done according to the precautionary measures. SURVEY SITES: There were 18 different sampling sites from where the water sample was required to be collected. But due to la ck of time we collected the water samples from ten different sites. All the water sampling sites were located in two union councils. WATERSAMPLING: The water sample was collected and kept in a bag that was specially designed to keep the water sample cool. Each water sample consisted of 50 ml sample. Also each water sample was labeled with a black marker followed by the name of the area and the